Amygdala and social network size

Amygdala at the centre of your social network

JANELLE WEAVER

A larger emotion-processing brain centre is linked to a bigger circle of friends.

The size of your amygdala indicates the extent of your social network.

How many friends do you have? A rough answer can be predicted by the size of a small, almond-shaped brain structure that is present in a wide range of vertebrates, scientists report today in Nature Neuroscience.

The researchers studied the amygdala, which is involved in inter-personal functions such as interpreting emotional facial expressions, reacting to visual threats and trusting strangers. Inter-species comparisons in non-human primates have previously shown that amygdala volume is associated with troop size, suggesting that the brain region supports skills necessary for a complex social life

On the basis of these past findings, psychologist Lisa Feldman Barrett of Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts, wondered whether a larger amygdala size allows some humans to build a richer social world.

Barrett’s team measured the amygdala volume in 58 healthy adults using brain images gathered during magnetic resonance imaging sessions. To construct social networks, the researchers asked the volunteers how many people they kept in regular contact with, and how many groups those individuals belonged to.

They found that participants who had bigger and more complex social networks had larger amygdala volumes. This effect did not depend on the age of the volunteers or their own perceived social support or life satisfaction, suggesting that happiness is not the underlying causal factor that links the size of this brain structure in an individual to their number of friends

“We’d all predict this relationship should be found, but [the authors] did it in a very smart way by ruling out other variables,” says cognitive neuroscientist Kevin Ochsner of Columbia University in New York City. “That’s why I think this paper is going to end up being a citation classic, because it demonstrates the relationship in a way that gives you confidence that it’s real,” he adds.

Brain teaser

But it’s still a mystery how the amygdala contributes to social networks. Perhaps the structure’s response to faces, emotions or emotional memories influences whether someone decides to develop and maintain relationships, says Brad Dickerson, a cognitive neuroscientist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who helped lead the study.

It’s likely that social behaviour relies on a much broader set of brain regions, Dickerson says. In the future, the team will use functional neuroimaging approaches to determine the relationship between patterns of brain activity in an individual and the size of social groups to which they belong.

Another important question is whether a big amygdala is a cause or a consequence of having a large social network. “In the end, it’s probably some of both,” Ochsner says. “But you first had to establish that the relationship really exists before you could address those critical questions.”

Source: Nature News

Posted in Others' work | Tagged | Leave a comment

Origins of human language

2011 brings a special issue of the journal Human Biology on
the genetic and cultural origins of human language. Below is a
sneak peek of the special issue:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/languageorigins

Posted in My work, Others' work | Tagged | Leave a comment

Parental antagonism theory of language evolution

The Parental Antagonism Theory of Language Evolution: Preliminary Evidence for the Proposal Please find attached a paper I have written presenting a new theory for language evolution (called “parental antagonism theory”). It is based, in part, on intragenomic conflict theory (see David Haig) and genomic imprinting (an important epigenetic phenomenon for mammalian, including human neurocognitive development). Empirical support for the parental antagonism theory of language evolution is presented in the paper, slated to be published in the academic journal Human Biology in 2011. All comments most welcome.

Posted in My work | 1 Comment

Scan Two of Sixteen

http://twitpic.com/3fb2qe

Posted in My work | Tagged | Leave a comment

Scanning Marlon

Posted in My work | Leave a comment

Baby’s genome hidden in Mother’s blood

Baby’s genome hidden in mother’s blood http://ff.im/-uSGi1

| Leave a comment

Variation in gestation length in mammals

Developmental biology: Placenta key to fetal growth rate

Nature 468, page 603 (02 December 2010)

doi:10.1038/468603d

Gestation period varies widely in the mammalian world, with some species developing twice as fast as others in the womb. This is largely because of differences in the arrangement of fetal and maternal tissues in the placenta.

Isabella Capellini at Durham University, UK, and her team analysed data from previous studies on neonatal brain mass, body and litter size, and maternal placental morphology from 109 mammalian species. They discovered that animals with placentas where fetal and maternal tissues interlock the most — creating a greater surface area over which nutrients can flow — gestate in less than half the time taken by animals that have placentas with a minimal surface area for nutrient exchange.

Note: The original study was published in The American Naturalist. Reference below

vol. 177, no. 1 The American Naturalist January 2011

Placentation and Maternal Investment in Mammals

By

Isabella Capellini,1,* Chris Venditti,2 and Robert A. Barton11. Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road,Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom; 2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Philip Lyle Building, Reading RG6 6BX,United Kingdom

| Leave a comment